Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Marie Curie: Not Attractive Enough to Represent a Threat to Anyone.
Marie Curie is best known as the first person to win two Nobel prizes. But, according to some she should have been known first and foremost as a Jew-temptress. Curie was not Jewish and four years after her husband Pierre died in a carriage accident she began an affair with renowned physicist and former student of her husband's, Paul Langevin. Langevin's estranged wife got wind of the affair and hired a PI who obtained certain letters exchanged between Curie and Langevin. These letters were then leaked to the French press who ran wild with the story labeling Curie as a home-wrecker-Jew-temptress. Ever vigilant, the French public ate the story up and Curie came back from a conference in Belgium to find her home (with her two children inside) surrounded by an angry mob. Incensed, Langevin challenged the editor of one of the newspapers running the story to a duel. The two men did face off against one another but no shots were reportedly fired. Still, Albert Einstein thought he needed to intervene on Curie's behalf so, strangely, he issued a statement, noting that Curie “has a sparkling intelligence, but despite her passionate nature, she is not attractive enough to represent a threat to anyone.”
Friday, January 22, 2010
Pythagoras v. Beans
Though all of his writings were lost, it is widely accepted that Pythagoras believed strongly that beans should be avoided at all costs. This was incorporated as a tenet into the quasi-religion he developed and his acolytes, the Pythagoreans, are said to have adhered to it unflinchingly. Bertrand Russell has gone on record as saying that bean-eschewing was among the two most important principles of the religion, yet may have led to its eventual downfall. Russell notes that Pythagoras "founded a religion on which the the main tenets were the transmigration of souls and the sinfulness of eating beans. His religion was embodied in a religious order, which, here and there, acquired rule of the state … But the unregenerate hankered after beans, and sooner or later rebelled."
However, even as the perfidious revolted others came to the support of the protein prohibition. The Pythagorean poet Callimachus even wrote a poem about his concurrence:
Keep your hands from beans, a painful food:
As Pythagoras enjoined, I too urge.
His fellow poet, Empedocles, took up the cause as well with his own turn of phrase:
Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans.
As did the Christian ‘heresiologist’ Saint Epiphanus in his collection the Panarion (‘Medicine Chest’) or Adversus Haereses:
Pythagoras the Samian, son of Mnesarchos, said that the monad is god, and that nothing has been brought into being apart from this. He was wont to say that wise men ought not to sacrifice animals to the gods, nor yet to eat what had life, or beans, nor to drink wine.
Cicero too, attempting to further explain the proscription in the process:
So Plato bids us go to our beds with our bodies so composed that there is nothing that brings distraction of disturbance to the mind. That, it is thought, is why the Pythagoreans are forbidden to eat beans which cause considerable flatulence and are thus inimical to those who seek peace of mind.
Yet whether Pythagoras actually refrained from eating beans is a source of some dispute. Aristoxenus, musical scholar and student of Aristotle, has noted that Pythagoras was no vegetarian and certainly had no problem with beans - even suggesting that beans were his absolute favorite food:
Pythagorus esteemed the bean above all other vegetables; for he said that it was both soothing and laxative – that is why he made particular use of it.7
Yet still the wretched among us long after these forbidden little pockets of iniquity and wonder why peace eludes us.
This Week in Crazy: Saparmurat Niyazov
A Turkmen politician who served as President (later President for Life) of Turkmenistan from November 2, 1990 until his death in 2006, Niyazov preferred his self-given title Türkmenbaşy, or Turkmenbashi, meaning Leader of Turkmens, referring to his position as the founder and president of the Association of Turkmens of the World. Niyazov is perhaps best known for his reputation of imposing his personal eccentricities upon the country, including renaming months after members of his family, and replacing the Turkmen word for bread with the name of his mother. Despite this reputation his decision to create a National Melon Day is still honored and celebrated to this day. He was famously quoted as saying "let the life of every Turkmen be as beautiful as our melons." Other laws and decrees did not survive Niyazov including: his 2005 ban on lip-syncing (believing it beneath the Turkmens' great creative spirit); his 2004 ban on beards and long hair on men; his ban on television reporters wearing makeup; and his decision to outlaw gold teeth advising his followers instead to chew on bones in order to strengthen their teeth and prevent tooth loss (he described his basis for this decree: "I watched young dogs when I was young. They were given bones to gnaw to strengthen their teeth. Those of you whose teeth have fallen out did not chew on bones. This is my advice..."). In December 2008, after his death, his successor reversed Niyazov's changes to the national anthem which had made numerous references to him.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Friday, September 18, 2009
Fact vs. Fancy: Did Ben Franklin Oppose the Elevation of the Bald Eagle to the Level of National Bird?
Ben Franklin did not entirely trust bald eagles even once referring to them in a letter from Paris as "bird[s] of bad moral character" lamenting their inherent laziness and lack of courage. The only reasonable alternative he could offer was the wild turkey for its impetuousness and sense of duty however the turkey did little to impress anyone in the Continental Congress during its hearings on June 22, 1782 and even Franklin conceded the deep vanity of the bird.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Favorite Moments in Judicial Activism: Nix v. Hedden
Editorial: If the people decide they suddenly want a tomato to be a vegetable, that's an issue best left to the legislature and the electoral processes where the matter can be debated, incorporated into the platforms of competing candidates and, if such a decision be improvidently made, the people could rightly demand the elected official's resignation or outright impeachment (no pun intended). Still some things are too important to be left to the legislature or a century of legal precedent like repealing corporate campaign finance limitations.
The Persistent Problem of Tricky Test Animals: The Clever Hans Effect
"Clever Hans" was a horse that toured Germany around the turn of the 20th Century allegedly capable of doing arithmetic (by tapping a hoof a number of times corresponding to the correct answer to a math problem). Though the spectacle pleased thousands of German onlookers, it was later proven by psychologist Oskar Pfungst that the horse didn't know arithmetic at all but was instead able to read the cues of the onlookers as their excitement appreciably mounted as the horse neared the correct answer. However, after thoroughly studying Hans well enough to direct performances himself, Pfungst discovered something frightful: he himself couldn't contain his excitement enough to keep from tipping off the horse - for what could be more delightful than a counting horse?!?. Thus, the resulting "Clever Hans Effect" has less to do with clever animals than stupid researchers. The effect would go on to manifest itself with studies of the irresistible charms of Washoe the chimp and Rico the Border Collie.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Wind-Powered: Jasmuheen
During the 1990s, Jasmuheen (born Ellen Greve) was probably the most famous advocate of Breatharianism, the belief that food and water are not absolutely necessary for the sustenance of human life where there are sufficient quantities of spirituality and sunlight. She famously claimed that she could go for months without food, however several interviewers found her house stocked full of food. She claimed the food was for her husband.
In 1999, she volunteered to put her beliefs to the test by not eating for one week while being monitored by the Australian version of the television program 60 Minutes. An unequivocal failure, Greve claimed that the test was flawed because on the first day of the test she had been confined in a hotel room near a busy road, saying that the stress and pollution kept her from getting the nutrients she needed from the air. The challenge was moved to a sunlit hill but was quickly stopped as an observing physician saw numerous signs that she was nearing medical danger and was perhaps trying to surreptitiously eat grass.
She challenged the results of the program pointing to the experiences of her no less than 6,000 followers (mostly in Germany). Though she claims these thousands of followers, there is no evidence that any have lived for long periods.
Jasmuheen claims that her beliefs are based on the writings and "more recent channeled material" of the Count of St Germain. She also claims that her DNA has expanded from 2 to 12 strands, to "absorb more hydrogen". When offered $30,000 to prove her claim with a blood test, she said that she didn't understand the question.
This Week in Crazy: Troy Hurtubise
Troy James Hurtubise is a Canadian inventor noted for his often bizarre creations that he tests on himself in spectacular and usually dangerous ways. Though Hurtubise is credited with a wide array of inventions of varying utility the majority of his career has been spent in pursuit of that most elusive of dreams: a bear-proof suit.
Hurtubise's obsession with bears began on August 4, 1984, when he was mauled by a grizzly bear.
The encounter had a profound effect on Hurtubise. Returning to his home province of Ontario, he decided to learn as much about grizzlies as he could. However, how could he learn about these creatures without subjecting himself, once again, to their terrifying wrath? The answer came while he was watching RoboCop in his college dorm in 1987. It was then that he decided to build a research suit that would be strong enough to survive a close encounter without harming the occupant. Such a robo-bear suit would allow him to search for bears, and answer important questions “from the bear's perspective”, he was quoted as saying.
Seven years and $150,000 later, Hurtubise had worked his way up to the Mark VI, the suit he believed could protect him from a grizzly. In order to test it, Hurtubise consulted widely asking onlookers to try to simulate a bear attack upon him as he wore the suit.
These tests saw members of a notorious Canadian bike gang paid to maul him, a 300-pound log swung into his abdomen and solar plexus, a BMW driven over him, as well as Hurtubise simply tossing himself down the side of an escarpment.
Though initial testing on a Kodiak bear proved troublesome, as even a smaller bear was able to rip the helmet from the suit quite easily while the overwhelming weight of the suit effectively eliminated the possibility of flight or retreat, Hurtubise is said to be attempting to make the suit explosion-proof as well and hopes to sell the suit soon.
Revolution Today: Thailand
In April 2007, Bhumibol Adulyadej, the King of Thailand, was portrayed with feet superimposed over his head, an act extremely offensive to many Thai people, in a video posted by a YouTube user named "Padidda". The Thai government banned the site for lèse majesté, and a host of other YouTube users responded by posting other clips even more offensive to Bhumibol, leading to tens of thousands of views, including: photos of Bhumibol with a thumb toe for a nose; photos of Bhumibol hoarding shoes; photos of Bhumibol in a Podiatrist's lab coat; and photos of Bhumibol wearing a crown with the Dr. Scholl's logo emblazoned across the front, proving once again that the people united will never be defeated.
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
Favorite Misdiagnoses Explained: Coprolalia
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Favorite Psychological Phenomena Explained: The Dunning-Kruger Effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect is an example of cognitive bias in which "people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it". They therefore suffer an illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average. This leads to the perverse result where less competent people will rate their own ability higher than relatively more competent people. The studies conducted by Justin Kruger and David Dunning and not coincidentally conducted at Cornell University were made famous in their paper entitled "Too Stupid To Know It?".
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Norman Mailer Describes Why He Didn’t Join in the Protests Outside of the 1968 Democratic Convention or the Silent Vigil Afterward
Ever modest, Mailer seems to offer that he was too tough to risk a beating by police as well as too tough to risk joining the candlelight vigil afterward protesting the police beatings. The means by which he was able to attain the objectivity necessary to make such statements may have something to do with Mailer referring to himself in the third person as “the reporter”:
The Protests:
“The reporter had an aversion to this. Besides, he was afraid of his own violence. It was not that he was such a good fighter, but he was not altogether courteous either – he had broken a man’s jaw in a fight not so long before, and was not certain the end of that was yet heard…He was not afraid of his own violence because he necessarily thought it would be so heinous to break a policeman’s jaw, good law-abiding citizen that he was! It was more that he was a little concerned with what the policeman’s friends and associates might do to him immediately afterward.”
The Vigil:
“The reporter did not join them…He could see them attacked by gangs, and the thought of taking a terrible beating in this company of non-violent McCarthyites and McGovernites, shoulder to shoulder with Arthur Miller, Jules Fieffer, Theo Bikel and Jeremy Larner, no, if he was going to take a beating, it was best to take it alone or with people he felt close to, people who were not so comparatively innocent of how to fight.”
--Miami and the Siege of Chicago
Actual footage of the reporter's own violence
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
Favorite Quotes Explained: Part 241
Quote: "I think therefore I am." --Descartes
Explanation: N/A as it's now accepted that Descartes was misquoted and actually said "I think I'd like some ham."
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
This Day in the History of Crazy: Thomas Eagleton
Thomas Eagleton (September 4, 1929 – March 4, 2007) a United States Senator from
Monday, June 01, 2009
ALTERNATIVES TO DEFINING INSANITY AS DOING THE SAME THING BUT EXPECTING A DIFFERENT RESULT:
-doing the same thing but expecting Steve Guttenberg to now be flattered by your rendition of the song that the three men sang to the baby in the movie.
-eating nothing but potatoes but expecting to be something other than coquettish.
-only toweling off your feet and then not expecting the rest of the bananas glacee to drip down from your torso where you spread it in an effort to demonstrate you were the kind of guy who enjoys the finer things in life.
-stealing packets of butter from restaurants without a real plan as to how to transport them without them perishing en route.
-foolishly believing that by eating only sticky foods you’ll be able to reverse the process of your molecules slowly dislocating that the ferret told you in no uncertain terms was too far gone to undo now.
Monday, May 11, 2009
This Day in the History of Crazy: Dr. Franz Lipp
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Le Pétomane
Pujol was born in Marseille. He was one of five children of François (a stonemason and sculptor) and Rose Pujol. Although a baker by profession, Pujol would entertain his customers by imitating musical instruments, and claim to be playing them behind the counter. Pujol decided to try his talent on the stage, and debuted in Marseille in 1887. After his act proved successful, he proceeded to
Some of the highlights of his stage act involved sound effects of cannon fire and thunderstorms, as well as playing 'O Sole Mio and La Marseillaise on an ocarina through a rubber tube in his anus. He could also blow out a candle from several yards away. His audience included Edward, Prince of Wales, King Leopold II of the Belgians and Sigmund Freud.
In the following decade Pujol tried to 'refine' and make his acts 'gentler'; one of his favourite numbers became a rhyme about a farm which he himself composed, and which he punctuated with the usual anal renditions of the animals' sounds. The climax of his act however involved him farting his impression of the 1906
With the outbreak of World War I, Pujol, horrified by the inhumanity of the conflict, retired from the stage and returned to his bakery in Marseille. Later he opened a biscuit factory in
Johnny Depp has repeatedly expressed interest in portraying Pujol in a major motion picture.
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
My Desires In The Event That I Should Be Incapacitated
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Get to Know a Historical Figure: Charles Sumner
Charles Sumner (January 6, 1811 – March 11, 1874) was an American politician and statesman
Friday, October 17, 2008
The top of the world; the highest point within 100 miles of Iowa City, Iowa; where, it's said, the sky is revealed to be but a lens giving out on to other floating worlds. Still Madge couldn't shake the thought that despite not having had cheese in years there was quite clearly a cheese stain on her shirt.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
The Principle
There are certain thoughts which one can merely think and they will never be the same. These thoughts are all around us like nourishing banana clusters. There are a finite number of these thoughts. Think them all and you will be as wise as the four winds or the three flavors (sweet, salty, salty-sweet) or those two guys in the back. However, each of us has a unique order – with slight variation permitted – in which we must think these thought or risk schizoid embolism. The stakes are high indeed. But without thinking any of these thoughts you risk collapse into the merest carnality: rampant sex without attachment, lust without devotion, having more pie without thinking about your one fat leg. The process of this principle is additionally complicated by the fact that the mark of many, but not all, of these thoughts is that it will be forgotten almost as soon as it’s thought. This is all made even more complicated by the existence of the “flouters” or “octogenarians” or “malamutes” whose role it is to try to rename the thoughts as hokum base and banal – never you worry about that mallet they’ll implore you. One may ask: if the very thinking of the thought will render me changed-forever how come I’ll forget it once I’ve thought it? But there is no simple answer to that question; no simpler anyway than to a question like how many plums is all of them plums? But the question serves to point up yet another danger: simply thinking one of the thoughts then forgetting it then thinking it again. Subsequent repetitions of the same thought will not have the same effect though there will be a slight yet gratifying tingle which for some is all the vindication they need. Those types find a life spent do-see-do-ing through the same thought rewarding. These people may set up huge temples to coax others to do their little fever dance but in the end they will meet violent ends as the axis on which they spin crumbles under the toiling mass of their bottom-heavy convictions heaving like a bag pipe even just walking down to the corner. One may think this terrain unnavigable, this game intractable, but this should not counsel resignation which would be met with foul language and insinuation about the city of your birth. Indeed, the road is long and not really even a road as much as a parkway or thoroughfare but perhaps I’ve already said too much; though I will conclude by noting that if you should ever have the thought why all these flowing robes? why so much pepper? you’re doing it wrong.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Walthingham
He was not a fat man; nor was he a particularly skinny man. He was likewise neither rich nor poor. And so he bore no mark of, or ready explanation for, the uncommon and unrelenting fervor with which he pursued food of any quality, at any time, and by any means. His methods ranged from simple footraces towards the food source to more cunning ruses - bait-and-switch, rope-a-dope, follow-the-birdy, breathe-very-deeply, lookout-for-that-bear and three-card-monty - usually called for when he’d lost the race or when other factors conspired to see another possessed of the food before him, such as the restaurant industry. Nothing in his past told of any period of deprivation and so theories of compensation were of no greater merit than those which posited some sort of inner emptiness as he was a particularly joyful person. Except, that is, for whenever food was present or presented shades of its own possibility at which times an assiduity overtook him as if the existence of his race depended on his immediate attention and inexorable determination. Yet it was this very singular will which arguably prevented such a peculiar proclivity from ever proceeding to the detriment of his reputation or social station. People were often taken aback by such wanton displays as him hiding with a Christmas ham or pouncing on a pile of pulled pork spotted from afar yet whatever alarm initially dawned in those in witness invariably gave way to a sort of admiration for, and inspiration by, the profound purpose which propelled him from one now-ravaged salad bar to the bus pan scraps just behind those always-swinging doors. And all agreed that he was indeed an estimable sort.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Like most things of the sort, some immediately turned away from it; others inclined to stare it down often approached it but in so doing they almost invariably became either disenchanted or desensitized and rejoined the throng of the former. And it was this thought which led Gary to first consider that his commitment to eradicating homelessness among sheep might be nothing more than a novelty.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
For a time he’d thought of himself as a tough not in the sense that he’d lift wallets or ruin topiary but that he knew what he knew and stared out as if on a world already traced with the hairless, fingerless hand of close-cropped chance. He could tell when someone was about to flee and he could tell when someone was about to eat. He sensed beginnings in the slightest of snack samplers and endings just after. He knew the form of wild winds and the content of nameless sauces. But this was not the first time he’d begun to feel self-consumed like a fat man, as wretched as wide, cursed to be covered in candy shell. And there’s no word for feeling like you know what you know whilst knowing that you’d previously known knowing only to once again be surprised at new sounds and meal deals. There’s not even a shorter way of saying it besides maybe at once sure and unsure; joint and several like the father and the son or the steps to clutterers’ anonymous. And so it was that his sudden fall was quite unexpected. When the world, one day, formed itself anew the terror which he felt was just too much and so he screamed and when he heard the sound of his own voice set against the world he now saw he screamed some more and when he felt that he could no longer scream this prospect too terrified him for its only by calling its name that terror relents and so he thought to write down his thought but no combination of vowels and consonants could capture the rough edge of it so he screamed himself silent and then resolved to hurl the pencils which had failed in the face of their greatest calling and the colored pencils too, though they had given slightly more effort, and when there was no more to throw or voice in his lungs he flung out his arms at intervals while extending his digits at alternating intervals and when he could barely lift his arms anymore he sprinted and sprinted away from the falling night and when his feet could move no longer he at last sensed that resignation was the only path left to what paltry righteousness there could be in such a feckless world and at last he sat down to the very lunch in which his doom seemed but a side. And it was only after he had nothing left to lash that he accommodated himself to the hot dogs hastily thrown into his macaroni and cheese.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
The Last Day of Langley Collyer - Chapter 1
The cure had begun to take effect: Homer's blindness was no match for the daily regiment of 100 oranges and black bread. Small wonder. His affliction was no more mysterious than the machinations of the outside world bent on infiltration of our perimeters and, once inside, forced adherence to various principles of determinism and weight loss which I've only been too proud to eschew these past years even if the efforts required for our continued security have surpassed even previous estimations but are quite commensurate with the persistence of their provocations as laid bare more by the silences between than the shouts that come ringing through our halls admonishing us to "smell the topiary" or "flush the grundles" or "sniff the dandies" or any number of countless exhortations designed for no purpose but to make me question my convictions; but I will not; I must not for were we to surrender at this point the bureaus and legions would have little choice but to try us for the highest brand of treason and treachery - they'd probably force us into educational programs designed to make us forget the powers of the life force just within once it's awoken with fragrance. Which brings me back to where I started: Homer. A fool would treat his affliction as if it were merely one sensory faculty affected. Such a simplistic view of the world belongs in the schoolyards or the docks. No, just as it takes two eyes to perceive depth, it takes all the senses together to behold the manifold mystery of our day. Things are only rightly understood when taste and smell are in concert, when touch and smell waltz, and when hearing and smell twirl. It was this folly that engendered Homer's compromised state. Homer had been relying too heavily on his eyes, had thought the world can simply be seen. Well it can't and if it could be known through a single sense it would surely be smell. That's where the oranges come in; there is no object in this world that is such a delight to each of the senses jointly and severally and there is nothing so uniformly disappointing to each of the sense as black bread. Why is it black any way? The point is this: through the systematic derangement and rearrangement of the all-sense scheme as executed through this repeated excitement and disappointment of the senses, Homer's senses could begin to work as a team again with the captain taking his post at the olfactory watchtower. It's already begun to work. I just need a few more weeks to allow its proper course but they advance daily. Will Homer's cure first afford me the reinforcement I so desperately need in our defense? Or will they overtake us and pound us into the submission of scolded children through campaigns to compromise heightened senses of smell or at least heightened awareness thereof? Or will these booby traps I've rigged throughout the newspaper piles spell victory for us once and for all? The answer is out there curling through the air like the aroma of ham or broccoli.